Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational analysis based on the charge simulation method (CSM) is used to predict the electric potential distribution produced by charges implanted within the surface layer of a solid dielectric. The potential distribution thus obtained is used to match the experimental distribution using the scanning electron microscope (SEM) mirror technique. Using an optimization iteration process, a comparison is obtained for quartz, alumina, and yttria. The computational analysis assumes a surface layer with a permittivity higher than that of the bulk. The justification for this assumption is discussed. The electric potential distribution produced by a surface with increased surface defects, as determined by the SEM mirror technique, indicates a surface with a higher permittivity. It is also shown that the ability of such a surface to store charges is decreased. The results are consistent with physical models based on band structure (or trapping energy) considerations.>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sudarshan et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: