PURPOSE: To evaluate incision sizes for 6.0 mm optic hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted with different injector systems and surgical techniques. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany. METHODS: In this prospective randomized trial of 100 cataract patients, hydrophobic acrylic IOLs (SN60WF) were implanted using 2 injector systems with 2 cartridges (Monarch II and Monarch III with C and D cartridges, respectively; Alcon) and 2 surgical techniques (direct implantation and wound-assisted docking implantation). Incision sizes were measured before and after phacoemulsification as well as before and after IOL implantation using a Tsuneoka microincision gauge. The Saphiro-Wilks test was performed to detect nonparametric distribution and the Kruskal-Wallis test, to test for significant differences between groups. RESULTS: The mean incision sizes (mm) at the 4 points of treatment with the Monarch III with the D cartridge were 1.98+/-0.07, 2.01+/-0.05, 2.42+/-0.07, and 2.51+/-0.05, respectively, with direct implantation and 1.92+/-0.06, 1.98+/-0.04, 2.02+/-0.11, and 2.09+/-0.11, respectively, with wound-assisted implantation. With the Monarch II with the C cartridge, the mean incision sizes were 2.17+/-0.06, 2.2+/-0.16, 2.77+/-0.11, and 2.86+/-0.11, respectively, with direct implantation and 2.12+/-0.10, 2.17+/-0.19, 2.19+/-0.09, and 2.28+/-0.08, respectively, with wound-assisted implantation. Postoperative incision sizes differed significantly from preoperative incision sizes and from each other (P<.05). CONCLUSION: With new injector systems and an appropriate docking implantation technique, foldable hydrophobic acrylic IOLs can be implanted through 2.0 mm tunnel incisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kohnen et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: