Key result
Combined labral and capsular reconstruction, femoral neck remplissage, and lysis of adhesions during revision hip arthroscopy improved PROs, with 2 of 6 followed patients converting to THA at 3 years.
Why the study?
To evaluate the patient-reported outcomes and survivorship of combined arthroscopic hip labral reconstruction/augmentation, capsular reconstruction, femoral neck remplissage and lysis of adhesions during revision hip arthroscopy.
Does combined arthroscopic hip labral reconstruction, capsular reconstruction, femoral neck remplissage and lysis of adhesions improve patient-reported outcomes and survivorship in patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy?
Observational (n=7)
Does combined arthroscopic hip labral reconstruction, capsular reconstruction, femoral neck remplissage and lysis of adhesions improve patient-reported outcomes and survivorship in patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy?
Combined arthroscopic hip labral reconstruction, capsular reconstruction, femoral neck remplissage and lysis of adhesions is a viable salvage procedure that can restore hip function in patients who have failed an initial hip arthroscopy, though total hip arthroplasty may be more appropriate for those with advanced osteoarthritis.
May offer salvage option in complex revision cases; leaves open need for prospective trials before wider adoption.
To evaluate the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and survivorship of combined arthroscopic hip labral reconstruction/augmentation, capsular reconstruction, femoral neck remplissage and lysis of adhesions. Patients ≥18 years old who underwent this combination of procedures during revision hip arthroscopy and were eligible for minimum 2-year follow-up were identified. PRO scores including Hip Outcome Score (HOS)-Activities of Daily Living scale, HOS-Sports scale, modified Harris Hip Score, Short Form 12, and Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, patient satisfaction and failure rates were analyzed. Seven patients (5 females and 2 males) with average age of 45.0 ± 5.2 (range: 40-54 years) met inclusion criteria. Patients had a median of 1 (range: 1-3) prior hip surgery at an outside institution. All patients had previously undergone femoral osteoplasty, and 85% (6/7) of patients had a labral repair performed. Four patients had no capsule closure performed in their prior procedures. Six patients were available for minimum 2-year follow-up. Two patients converted to total hip arthroplasty: one patient with four prior hip arthroscopies and the other had advanced osteoarthritis with outerbridge grade 3/4 defects requiring microfracture. Mean patient satisfaction was 7 (range: 2-9). At mean follow-up of 3 years, most patients who underwent the combination of labral reconstruction, capsular reconstruction, femoral neck remplissage and lysis of adhesions during revision hip arthroscopy demonstrated improved PROs. This salvage procedure has the potential to restore hip function in patients who have failed an initial hip arthroscopy procedure. In patients with these pathologies present and concomitant joint space narrowing, a total hip arthroplasty may be a more appropriate salvage option.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Melugin et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Failed initial hip arthroscopy requiring revision (n=7). Combined arthroscopic hip labral reconstruction/augmentation, capsular reconstruction, femoral neck remplissage and lysis of adhesions was evaluated on Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and survivorship. Combined labral and capsular reconstruction, femoral neck remplissage, and lysis of adhesions during revision hip arthroscopy improved PROs, with 2 of 6 followed patients converting to THA at 3 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: