This report contains the chemistry of the ruthenium−carbene functionality bonded to the dibenzotetramethyltetraaza[14]annulene dianion, tmtaa. [{Ru(tmtaa)} 2 (μ-C 8 H 12 )], 1, was the most appropriate starting material, as it contains a labile olefin, which can be displaced by a number of ligands to give [Ru(tmtaa)(L)(L‘)] [L = L‘ = Py, 2; L = CO, L‘ = thf, 3; L = Bu t NC, L‘ = thf, 4; L = L‘ = Bu t NC, 5 ]. Reaction of 1 with diazoalkanes led to the displacement of the olefin and gave the corresponding carbene derivatives [Ru(tmtaa)(CRR‘)] [R = R‘ = Ph, 6; R = Ph, R‘ = H, 7; R = Ph, R‘ = COOMe, 8 ], which have square-pyramidal structures. Complexes 7 and 8 underwent a remarkable labilization of the carbene functionality in the reaction with carbon monoxide, while 6 was only converted to the corresponding carbonyl [Ru(tmtaa)(CPh 2 )(CO)], 10, by CO. The reaction of 7 with both CO and Bu t NC led to the migration of the carbene to one of the metalladiimino rings of the ligands in 12 and 13, while the reaction of 8 with both CO and Bu t NC enabled us to intercept the preliminary product of a free-radical-type migration of the carbene to the tmtaa ligand, with the isolation of 11 and 14 . The ligand (CO or Bu t NC)-induced migration of the CR 2 fragment to the macrocycle seemed to proceed via a carbene mechanism in the case of 7, while 8 seemed to prefer a free-radical-like pathway. This assumption was further supported by extended Hückel calculations and by the reaction of 6 − 8 with ligands of different σ/π donor/acceptor capability. The pyridine converted 6 − 8 to the corresponding coordinate adducts, 15 − 17, while the reaction of 7 with PMe 3 led to the formation of [Ru(tmtaa)(PMe 3 ) 2 ] and stilbenes, via a plausible carbene mechanism. The reaction of 8 with PMe 3 proceeded through a free-radical pathway leading to 19, which has a structure similar to 11 and 14 . The ligand-induced labilization of the metallacarbene functionality in the macrocyclic environment was analyzed using the extended Hückel calculations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klose et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: