BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of two different foldable anterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses for high myopia. DESIGN: A prospective interventional case series at the Eye Clinic, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-two eyes of 31 patients received iris-claw lens (group 1) (Artiflex AC 401, Ophtec), and 43 eyes of 22 patients received angle-supported lens (group 2) (I-Care, Corneal). METHODS: The mean preoperative spherical equivalents for group 1 and group 2 were -12.13 D and -18.95 D, respectively. Endothelial cell density was measured at day 1 and at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months for follow ups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage change in endothelial cell density and improvement in visual acuity. RESULTS: At the 18-months follow up, uncorrected visual acuity improved to logMAR 0.37 ± 0.23 from 1.60 ± 0.10 in group 1, and logMAR 0.47 ± 0.14 from 0.70 ± 0.20 in group 2; best spectacle corrected visual acuity improved to logMAR 0.23 ± 0.22 from logMAR 0.36 ± 0.14) in group 1, and logMAR 0.29 ± 0.18 from logMAR 0.50 ± 0.20) in group 2 (P<0.001, in both groups). Mean decreased endothelial cell density was 241 cells/mm(2) (8.61%) and 223 cells/mm(2) (8.42%) at 18 months follow up in group 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.17) but significant in comparison to preoperative values for both groups (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although both iris-claw and angle-supported lenses offer good refractive outcomes significant endothelial cell density was observed at 18 months follow up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akçay et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: