Resilience is generally understood as a pattern of positive adaptation following significant stress, adversity, or risk, and is often examined when looking to see why some individuals fall victim to despair while others seem to thrive. Previous studies highlight the biological, psychological, and sociological aspects of resilience. This article suggests these perspectives be extended by including spirituality in the current discourse on resilience. By examining etic (variable-centered or quantitative) and emic (person-centered or qualitative) perspectives within the context of individuals suffering from depressive disorders, a four-factor model of resilience is proposed, involving: (a) physical and biological strengths, (b) psychological resourcefulness, (c) interpersonal or emotional skills, and (d) spiritual capabilities. In the end, some clinical implications are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew R. Hatala (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: