Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
For pulse compression, "stretch processing" offers a low sampling rate, computationally simple alternative to the conventional matched-filter-based approach for radar/sonar receivers to pulse-compress the linear frequency modulated (a.k.a. "chirp," "linear chirp," or "sweep signal") radar returns. A question remains in the open literature whether this "stretch processing" method could be applied to other constant-modulus polynomial-phase modulations. A concise mathematical proof is presented to show the answer as "no"; the linear frequency modulation (LFM) is the only constant-modulus polynomial-phase-based pulse compression suitable for "stretch processing".
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeh et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: