We examined the role of species and functional-group diversity in the performance of model plant assemblages at the level of the plant neighborhood (a central, focal, or “target” plant and its neighbors). Three hundred and sixty plant neighborhoods were constructed with one to four species (drawn from a pool of six) and one to three functional groups. Our assemblages were modeled after prairie grassland communities typical of the Midwestern regions of North America. The three functional groups were legumes (Vicia villosa and Astragalus canadensis), grasses (Panicum virgatum and Bouteloua gracilis), and non-leguminous forbs (Rudbeckia hirta and Achillea millefolium) known to co-occur in nature and common to Cedar Creek Natural History Area, Anoka County, Minnesota. We measured total above- and belowground biomass, soil moisture, canopy cover, CO2 photosynthetic drawdown, and rate of decomposition. Performance of neighborhoods, as measured by these six variables, showed significant associations with both species and functional-group richness, with greatest magnitude of response variables occurring when both species and functional-group richness were high. Specifically, all variables except decomposition showed significant associations with both species and functional-group richness. We suggest that spatially well-mixed, functionally diverse, and species-rich grassland assemblages may outproduce aggregated, depauperate (poor in either functional groups or species) assemblages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naeem et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: