Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Unlike a number of other monocarbonyl-substituted complexes CoCp(CO)L (Cp = (η 5 -C 5 H 5 )), chemical oxidation of the L = triphenylphosphine derivative CoCp(CO)(PPh 3 ), 1, is known to give, in the absence of added PPh 3, the di substituted phosphine complex [CoCp(PPh 3 ) 2 ] + rather than the simple 17-electron radical cation 1 + . Electrochemistry of 1 in CH 2 Cl 2 /[NBu 4 ][B(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ] ( E 1/2 ( 1 / 1 + ) = −0.38 V vs ferrocene) shows that the favored anodic products depend on the concentration of 1 . At low concentrations (e.g., 10 −4 M) and on the cyclic voltammetry time scale, the radical cation 1 + dominates, but at higher concentrations and longer reaction times, a quantitative mixture of CoCp(CO) 2 and [CoCp(PPh 3 ) 2 ] + is produced in an overall “half-electron” process. On the basis of cyclic voltammetry, chronoamperometry, bulk electrolysis, and IR spectroelectrochemistry, a “radical−substrate” mechanism is proposed involving the reaction of 1 + with 1 to give transient [Co 2 Cp 2 (CO) 2 (PPh 3 ) 2 ] + . This putative dimer radical cation intermediate may be viewed as an odd-electron analogue of the intermediates that have previously been invoked by Kochi, Atwood, and others to explain ligand-transfer reactions between cation/anion pairs of organometallic complexes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nafady et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: