It is well-known that the particle size of Au nanoparticles enormously affects the catalytic activity of supported gold catalysts in many reactions. The origin of the Au particle size effect is still widely debated. In this work, we precisely deposited different thicknesses of ultrathin TiO 2 overcoats onto three Au/TiO 2 catalysts with Au particle sizes of 2.9 ± 0.6 (Au/TiO 2 -S), 5.0 ± 0.8 nm (Au/TiO 2 -M), and 10.2 ± 1.6 nm (Au/TiO 2 -L) using atomic layer deposition (ALD). High-resolution transmission electron microscopy illustrated the Au nanoparticles on these three samples were encapsulated by the TiO 2 overcoat. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements showed that the Au nanoparticles remained at metallic state after applying TiO 2 ALD overcoat. Diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy measurements of CO chemisorption further revealed that the TiO 2 overcoat preferentially decorated at the low-coordination sites of Au nanoparticles and broadly tuned the population of these sites accessible for participating in reactions. In CO oxidation reaction, the TiO 2 coated Au/TiO 2 -S catalysts strikingly demonstrated considerably higher activities than the uncoated Au/TiO 2 -M and Au/TiO 2 -L catalysts, even though the former ones contained significantly less amount of CO adsorption sites due to the TiO 2 overcoating. Our work shows direct evidence that CO adsorption on the low-coordination Au sites is not the rate-determining step, and the Au particle size effect in CO oxidation is NOT related with either the number of the low-coordination Au sites or the changes in oxidation states. Size-related change in the length of perimeter sites at the Au–TiO 2 interface could certainly play a role in the Au particle size effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yao et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: