Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is still the best marker both for primary diagnosis and post-treatment monitoring of patients with colorectal cancer. Monoclonal antibodies, especially CA 19-9 and CA 50 may give additional information whereas CA 125 seems to be of no value in patients with colorectal cancer. The sensitivity of CEA determination for Dukes' A carcinomas is as low as 30%, but increases to 85% for Dukes' D carcinomas. The best clinical benefit of CEA is in postoperative monitoring of surgically treated patients with colorectal cancer. The sensitivity and specificity for distant metastases are 85%. The sensitivity in the detection of local recurrence is low (40%) but the specificity is still high (80%). A high CEA level postoperatively strongly suggests either local recurrence or disseminated disease, but a negative value does not exclude their presence. If CEA is negative both preoperatively and one month postoperatively, CA 19-9 or CA 50 may be used in the monitoring of these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pamela Roberts (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: