Key result
A referenced 2003 trial of restrictive versus standard fluid therapy in 172 patients undergoing colorectal resection showed that fluid overload and fluid retention were not beneficial.
Why the study?
Does restrictive fluid therapy improve wound healing and cardiopulmonary function compared to standard fluid therapy in patients undergoing colorectal resection?
Does restrictive fluid therapy improve wound healing and cardiopulmonary function compared to standard fluid therapy in patients undergoing colorectal resection?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
This editorial reflects on historical evidence demonstrating that restrictive fluid therapy is preferable to standard fluid overload in surgical patients.
Birgitte Brandstrup (2018) conducted an editorial in Colorectal resection (n=172). Restrictive fluid therapy vs. Standard fluid therapy was evaluated on Fluid overload and fluid retention. A referenced 2003 trial of restrictive versus standard fluid therapy in 172 patients undergoing colorectal resection showed that fluid overload and fluid retention were not beneficial.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: