This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Due to advances in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, a knotless suture anchor is expected to hold more than two suture limbs. The objective of this study is to investigate whether when employing different fixation mechanisms, the suture-holding strength of knotless anchors are altered by the number of loaded sutures. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of different fixation mechanisms on the suture-holding strength of knotless anchors when varying the number of loaded sutures. Materials and Methods: Three types of knotless anchors (spiral core clamping, winged clamping, and spooling) were tested, with each anchor double-loaded or quadruple-loaded. Cyclic loading was applied, followed by a tensile load until failure. Clinical failure load was defined by 3 mm slippage. A two-way ANOVA was performed to examine the effects of suture anchors and suture number. Results: The two-way ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between the type of suture anchor and the number of sutures ( P < 0.001). Specifically, increasing the number of sutures enhanced the suture-holding strength for the spiral core clamping anchor and the winged clamping anchor ( P < 0.001 for both). Conversely, the spooling anchor did not show any improvement in suture-holding strength with an increased number of sutures. Conclusions: The suture-holding strength of knotless suture anchors is influenced by the number of loaded sutures, with quadruple-loaded spiral core and winged clamping anchors outperforming double-loaded ones, while the spooling anchor shows no improvement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: