Key result
Surgical aortic valve replacement in patients aged ≥75 years resulted in 2.1% operative mortality, with 5- and 10-year overall survival rates of 87.2% and 65.1%, respectively.
Why the study?
What are the early and long-term outcomes of isolated surgical aortic valve replacement with stented bioprosthetic valves in patients aged 75 years or older with aortic stenosis?
Cohort (n=94)
What are the early and long-term outcomes of isolated surgical aortic valve replacement with stented bioprosthetic valves in patients aged 75 years or older with aortic stenosis?
Surgical aortic valve replacement remains a safe and feasible option with excellent long-term survival for elderly patients (≥75 years) with aortic stenosis, particularly those with lower STS scores and without chronic kidney disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Provides single-center AVR outcomes in elderly AS patients; leaves open TAVI comparisons in contemporary practice.
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the early and long-term outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) in elderly patients in the era of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2018, 94 patients aged ≥75 years underwent isolated AVR with stented bioprosthetic valves for aortic valve stenosis (AS). The main etiologies of AS were degenerative (n=63) and bicuspid (n=21). The median follow-up duration was 40.7 months (range, 0.6-174 months). RESULTS: Operative mortality occurred in 2 patients (2.1%) and paravalvular leak occurred in 1 patient. No patients required permanent pacemaker insertion after surgery. Late death occurred in 11 patients. The overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 87.2% and 65.1%, respectively. The rates of freedom from valve-related events at 5 and 10 years were 94.5% and 88.6%, respectively. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (p=0.013) and chronic kidney disease (p=0.030) were significant factors affecting long-term survival. The minimal p-value approach demonstrated that an STS score of 3.5% was the most suitable cut-off value for predicting long-term survival. CONCLUSION: Surgical AVR for elderly AS patients may be feasible in terms of early mortality and postoperative complications, particularly paravalvular leak and permanent pacemaker insertion. The STS score and chronic kidney disease were associated with long-term outcomes after AVR in the elderly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sohn et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve stenosis (n=94). Surgical aortic valve replacement was evaluated on Operative mortality. Surgical aortic valve replacement in patients aged ≥75 years resulted in 2.1% operative mortality, with 5- and 10-year overall survival rates of 87.2% and 65.1%, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: