Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Superstructure design of short‐ and medium‐span highway bridge systems may be conceived as a process of multilevel and multiobjective optimization. Three optimization levels are identified: (1) Level 1—component optimization; (2) level 2—structural configuration optimization; and (3) level 3—overall system optimization. Designs may be optimized by separately or simultaneously considering one, two, or more of the following objectives: cost, prestressing steel or concrete consumption, and superstructure depth. The optimal solution may be found by a sequence of nonlinear programming and sieve‐search techniques. Levels 1 and 2 optimizations identify the best solutions for specific components (precast I‐girders, voided and solid slabs, single‐ and two‐cell box girders) and layouts (for precast I‐girder: one, two, and three; simple or continuous spans). Level 3 optimization selects the overall best system for given bridge lengths, widths, and traffic loadings. The present study results in: (1) A systematic procedure for bridge design; (2) a rational approach to optimization of standard precast sections; (3) direct design aids for selection of optimized bridge systems; and (4) simplified optimality criteria for preliminary design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cohn et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: