Observational (n=8)
No
We previously reported aberrant glycosylation of lumican, one of small leucine-rich proteoglycans (SLRPs), in aortic valves in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS). Extending the study, we here characterized other SLRPs of proline/arginine-rich end leucine-rich repeat protein (PRELP), decorin, and biglycan in AS valves. Specifically, thickened and calcified (AS-C) areas and apparently non-thickened and non-calcified (AS-N) areas of aortic valves were sampled in 8 patients with AS. Then amounts of three molecules with or without removal of N-glycosylation by PGNase were compared between the AS-C and AS-N areas. As a result, the amounts of PRELP with moderate and/or low amounts of N-glycosylation were found decreased in the AS-C areas compared to the AS-N areas. The amounts of decorin with both glycosaminoglycan (GAG) and N-linked oligosaccharides were decreased in the AS-C area compared to the AS-N area. Moreover, the amounts of biglycan with GAG and N-linked oligosaccharides were decreased, instead, the amounts of biglycan without GAG were increased in the AS-C areas compared to AS-N areas. These quantitative and qualitative changes of the three SLRPs detected here may be involved in the progression of AS changes of aortic valves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Furukawa et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Aortic valve stenosis (n=8). Thickened and calcified (AS-C) areas of aortic valves vs. Apparently non-thickened and non-calcified (AS-N) areas of identical aortic valves was evaluated on Amounts and glycosylation status of small leucine-rich proteoglycans (PRELP, decorin, and biglycan) (p=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: