Key result
Coronary artery ectasia was associated with higher rates of acute myocardial infarction and increased thrombotic markers, while prior antiplatelet therapy was associated with a lower AMI rate.
Why the study?
Does antiplatelet treatment reduce the rate of acute myocardial infarction in patients with coronary artery ectasia?
Observational (n=419)
Does antiplatelet treatment reduce the rate of acute myocardial infarction in patients with coronary artery ectasia?
Coronary artery ectasia appears to have a thrombotic component, and antiplatelet therapy may reduce the risk of acute myocardial infarction in these patients.
Associated factors in CAE may aid risk stratification; leaves open whether interventions targeting them reduce AMI.
Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is a rare disease and a substantial portion of patients with CAE are first diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The question was raised if CAE was a kind of thrombotic disease. We assessed a consecutive series of 119 patients with CAE including 32 patients with AMI (CAE + AMI group) and 87 patients without AMI (CAE group). During the same period, 90 patients with coronary heart disease, 90 patients with normal coronary arteries (control), and 120 AMI patients without CAE (AMI group) were randomly selected and evaluated. Both current and previous AMI prevalence rates in the CAE population were higher than the AMI rate for the other patients undergoing coronary angiograms; the mean platelet volume and fibrinogen were increased in the CAE + AMI and CAE groups. For patients with CAE with AMI, most of the thrombotic lesions were in the ectasia site. After dividing the patients with CAE into with and without antiplatelet treatment groups before admission, the AMI rate was lower in the antiplatelet group. Platelets may participate in the thrombotic process in CAE. Antiplatelet treatment may decrease the AMI rate of patients with CAE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Coronary artery ectasia (n=419). Coronary artery ectasia vs. Patients without coronary artery ectasia was evaluated on Acute myocardial infarction prevalence. Coronary artery ectasia was associated with higher rates of acute myocardial infarction and increased thrombotic markers, while prior antiplatelet therapy was associated with a lower AMI rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: