Key result
Heart rate recovery at 1 minute following exercise testing independently predicted periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing elective PCI (OR 0.744; 95% CI 0.617-0.897; p=0.002).
Why the study?
Periprocedural myocardial infarction is a significant complication of elective PCI linked to increased morbidity and mortality, but the predictive role of CPET-assessed heart rate recovery was unknown.
Does heart rate recovery assessed by CPET predict periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing elective PCI?
Observational (n=401)
Does heart rate recovery assessed by CPET predict periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing elective PCI?
Odds Ratio: 0.744 (95% CI 0.617–0.897)
p-value: p=0.002
Lower heart rate recovery at 1 and 3 minutes after peak exercise during CPET is an independent predictor of periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing elective PCI.
HRR may stratify PMI risk before elective PCI; leaves open whether autonomic modulation reduces events.
Aim/Background Periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) remains a significant complication of elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures and is linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Heart rate recovery (HRR), reflecting autonomic function and parasympathetic reactivation, has been established to predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes. This study investigates the association between HRR, assessed through cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), and the occurrence of PMI in patients undergoing elective PCI. Materials and Methods This retrospective observational study included 401 patients who underwent elective PCI between January 2022 and September 2024. HRR was measured at 1‐ and 3‐min intervals following CPET. Baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were analyzed alongside procedural variables. PMI was defined based on the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Statistical analyses, including multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, were performed to assess the predictive value of HRR. Results Patients with PMI exhibited significantly lower HRR at both 1 min (11.12 ± 3.25 vs. 14.21 ± 4.22, p < 0.001) and 3 min (42.99 ± 13.17 vs. 48.36 ± 9.72, p < 0.001) after peak exercise compared to those without PMI. ROC analysis revealed HRR as a reliable predictor of PMI, with AUCs of 0.723 (1 min) and 0.616 (3 min). Multivariate analysis confirmed HRR at 1 min (OR: 0.744, 95% CI: 0.617–0.897, p = 0.002) and 3 min (OR: 0.950, 95% CI: 0.905–0.999, p = 0.044) as independent predictors of PMI. Conclusion HRR measured by CPET independently predicts PMI in patients undergoing elective PCI. Incorporating HRR into preoperative risk assessments could enhance clinical decision‐making and improve procedural outcomes. Future studies are needed to explore its integration into standard PCI protocols for better risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study conducted an observational in Elective percutaneous coronary intervention (n=401). Heart rate recovery (HRR) assessed by CPET was evaluated on Periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) (OR 0.744, 95% CI 0.617-0.897, p=0.002). Heart rate recovery at 1 minute following exercise testing independently predicted periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing elective PCI (OR 0.744; 95% CI 0.617-0.897; p=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: