Gypsum amendments in marsh soils may affect the recovery of applied P fertilizer as the addition of Ca and sulphate alters the P sorption and release capacities of soils through their effects on P adsorption and precipitation processes. The effect of gypsum on P recovery was studied in a laboratory experiment where gypsum was added at 0, 6, 20, and 100g kg -1 to six representative marsh soils from SW Spain fertilized with 200 or 2000mg Pkg -1 applied as NH 4 H 2 PO 4 . Recovery was measured as the increase in Olsen P after 30, 60, and 150 days. P forms were also studied at these times, using sequential chemical extraction. Recovery of applied P decreased with increase in initial Olsen P (P status), Ca saturation, and sulphate concentration in the 1:1 soil extract. Less than 10% of applied P was recovered as Olsen P from the soils with highest P status and Ca saturation (LB2, LB5) after 30 days at the lower fertilizer P rate. P recovered from soils with an initial low Olsen P and high Na saturation (LB3 and LB4) was much higher (more than 50% in LB4 at 30 days at the two P rates). The addition of gypsum increased recovery of applied P (measured as Olsen P) in soils with a high degree of reclamation (high Olsen P and high Ca saturation): in LB2 and LB5, the recovery was double in samples amended with gypsum at 100g kg -1 than in nonamended samples at 150 days. By contrast, recovery of applied P was decreased by gypsum in soils with high Na saturation and an initial low P status. The effect of gypsum on recovery in high P - high Ca soils is related to an interference of sulphate with sorption processes that reduces short-term P sorption and increases the proportion of applied P that precipitates as soluble (bicarbonate extractable) phosphates in the long run. The effect of gypsum on recovery in low P (high Na saturation) soils is due to the increased P sorption capacity resulting from increased Ca saturation. Gypsum amendments increase the efficiency of fertilizer P, contributing to enhanced productivity of freshly reclaimed saline and sodic marsh soils.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Delgado et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: