This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Purpose: To explore the clinical outcomes associated with screw loosening after S2 alar-iliac (SAI) screw fixation for adult spinal deformity (ASD). Overview of the literature: SAI fixation is widely used in ASD corrective surgery; despite the biomechanical advantages of this screw, complications such as screw loosening remain a significant concern. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 27 patients undergoing corrective surgery for ASD using SAI as the distal fixation point at a single institution between February 2013 and February 2018. Patients were divided into non-loosening (N) and loosening (L) groups based on radiological evidence of screw loosening (radiolucent area of 1 mm around the screw) and compared for demographic characteristics, bone mineral density (T-score), spinal alignment parameters, and patient-reported outcome using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) scores. Results: Screw loosening was observed in 78% of patients (n = 21/27); however, there were no statistically significant differences between the N and L groups in terms of the preoperative and 5-year postoperative JOABPEQ scores (p > 0.05 across all domains) and spinal sagittal alignment (p > 0.05). The improvements achieved through corrective surgery were largely maintained regardless of the presence of screw loosening. Conclusions: SAI screw loosening is a common sequela in ASD surgery; however, its loosening might not affect long-term clinical outcomes. Therefore, the choice of fixation should be individualized based on patient factors such as age and bone quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagatani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: