The electrolytic MgO coating on Mg alloy has been carried out in aqueous solution to improve its corrosion resistance. The as-coating was which was formed by the electrolysis, , and finally transformed into MgO at . The surface morphology and phase structure were analyzed using scanning electron microscope and grazing angle X-ray diffraction. Polarization curves and immersion tests were used to evaluate the corrosion resistance of the coated specimens. More ions were produced, and the migration of was enhanced at a more negative applied potential, leading to a higher nucleation rate of on the specimen and resulting in the (001) preferred orientation. The weight gain resulted from coatings increased with increasing deposition time for the initial , and the increasing rate slowed down after due to the precipitation of in the solution. A coating deposited at for and annealed at for was suggested to provide a more uniform and dense MgO protective coating, which results in a reduction of corrosion current density from 99.5 down to and the enlarged passivation region between and in NaCl aqueous solution, with respect to the uncoated specimen. Compared with AZ91D magnesium alloy substrate, the corrosion resistance was improved nearly 2 orders by the electrolytic MgO ceramic coating. However, the bonding strength, , should be further improved to satisfy the minimum requirement, , for the orthopedic implants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: