Traditional breeding is approaching its efficiency limit in addressing global food security challenges, climate change, and multi-dimensional information integration. Artificial intelligence (AI) and digital phenotyping have become core driving forces in data-driven breeding. This review systematically elaborates the evolutionary roadmap from AI breeding 1.0 , which relies on traditional phenotypic data, to the emerging paradigm of AI breeding 2.0 . We clarify the core differences between these two paradigms, dissect the “data divide” in the transition process, and summarize the integrated technical framework underlying AI breeding 2.0 . The central argument is that the core limitation of AI breeding 1.0 lies in data inadequacy rather than constraints on algorithmic capacity. The transition to AI breeding 2.0 relies on standardized high-throughput digital phenotyping, multi-modal data integration, and closed-loop data-centric breeding systems. Finally, we propose four priority actions to promote the widespread adoption of data-driven breeding and provide an actionable roadmap for enhancing global crop improvement efforts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: