Why the study?
While serum natriuretic peptides have an established diagnostic role in heart failure, easily acquired saliva NT-proBNP has been studied little.
Can saliva NT-proBNP correlate with serum NT-proBNP and discriminate heart failure from other causes of dyspnoea?
Can saliva NT-proBNP correlate with serum NT-proBNP and discriminate heart failure from other causes of dyspnoea?
Saliva NT-proBNP correlates with serum levels in acute decompensated heart failure but lacks the discriminatory power to diagnose heart failure in dyspneic patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Saliva NT-proBNP shows limited diagnostic utility in dyspneic patients; leaves open its role as noninvasive HF biomarker pending larger validation studies.
Background: Serum natriuretic peptides (NPs) have an established role in heart failure (HF) diagnosis. Saliva NT-proBNP that may be easily acquired has been studied little. Methods: Ninety-nine subjects were enrolled; thirty-six obese or hypertensive with dyspnoea but no echocardiographic HF findings or raised NPs served as controls, thirteen chronic HF (CHF) patients and fifty patients with acute decompensated HF (ADHF) requiring hospital admission. Electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, 6 min walking distance (6MWD), blood and saliva samples, were acquired in all participants. Results: Serum NT-proBNP ranged from 60–9000 pg/mL and saliva NT-proBNP from 0.64–93.32 pg/mL. Serum NT-proBNP was significantly higher in ADHF compared to CHF (p = 0.007) and in CHF compared to controls (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in saliva values between ADHF and CHF, or between CHF and controls. Saliva and serum levels were positively associated only in ADHF patients (R = 0.352, p = 0.012). Serum NT-proBNP was positively associated with NYHA class (R = 0.506, p < 0.001) and inversely with 6MWD (R = −0.401, p = 0.004) in ADHF. Saliva NT-proBNP only correlated with age in ADHF patients. Conclusions: In the current study, saliva NT-proBNP correlated with serum values in ADHF patients, but could not discriminate between HF and other causes of dyspnoea. Further research is needed to explore the value of saliva NT-proBNP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rammos et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: