Why the study?
To compare the outcome of laryngeal mask airway insertion with sevoflurane versus propofol as an induction agent in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.
Does sevoflurane improve excellent outcome of laryngeal mask airway insertion compared to propofol in patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia?
Does sevoflurane improve excellent outcome of laryngeal mask airway insertion compared to propofol in patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia?
Sevoflurane is considered a safe and reliable induction agent compared to propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in patients undergoing elective surgery.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective: To compare the excellent outcome of laryngeal mask airway insertion with sevoflurane versus propofol as induction agent in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. Study Design: Randomized control trial. Study Setting: was conducted at Department of Anesthesia, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore from November 2020 to April 2021. Materials and Methods: Using a random number table, patients were randomised into two groups at random. Group A was given up to 2.5 mg/kg of propofol intravenously while breathing 100% oxygen through a face mask. The anaesthetic circuit in Group B was primed for 30 seconds with Sevoflurane 8% IN N2O 50% and O2 (flow rate 8 liter/minute). Results: In our study the mean age of the patients was 33.89±9.64 years. 70% patients were males and 30% patients were females. The study results showed the excellent outcome was observed in 70.50% patients and it was not observed in 29.50% patients. Conclusion: Our study results concluded that the Sevoflurane is a safe and reliable anesthetic compared with currently available Propofol agent in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sevoflurane provides a safe induction alternative to propofol for LMA insertion; extends RCT evidence on efficacy in elective surgical patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: