Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dibenzocycloheptatrienyl phosphanes (dibenzotropylidene phosphanes=TROPPR) 11a–c may be easily prepared from dibenzocycloheptatrienyl chloride 8 and the secondary phosphanes R2PH [9a: R=Ph; 9b: R=4-Me-C6H4; 9c: R=cyclohexyl (Cyc)] in good yields. Alternatively, the di(tert-butyl)phosphanyl substituted TROPPBut derivative 4 was obtained along with the phosphane 5 by a mechanistically still unknown rearrangement of a strained phosphorus ylide I. The conformations of these new phosphanes were established by X-ray analyses performed for the compounds TROPPBut4 and TROPPPh11a. The R2P moiety is bonded to an axial position of the central seven-membered ring, which adopts a boat conformation. Thereby a rigid concave binding site containing a phosphane and an olefin function is formed, which should allow the synthesis of a wide range of transition metal complexes. In order to test how far the particular shape of the TROPP-type ligands enforces metal–olefin interactions, the coinage metal complexes [(TROPPPh)Cu(µ2-Cl)]2, 13, [(TROPPPh)Ag(µ2-O2SOCF3)]2, 16, [(TROPPPh)2Ag][O3SCF3], 17 and [(TROPPPh)AuCl], 19 were prepared. These were completely characterized by multinuclear NMR experiments in solution and the solid state, as well as by X-ray analyses. The structural and NMR data show that the interaction between the metal center M and the olefin moiety of the TROPP ligand is weak and decreases in the order Cu>Ag>Au. Indeed, for 19 (M=Au) no interaction could be observed. In the silver complex 17, coupling between an Ag nucleus and a proton of a bonded olefin was determined for the first time [J(109/107AgH)=0.4 Hz]. In solution the complexes derived from TROPP-type ligands seem to have an enhanced (kinetic) stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomaier et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: