In 24 patients with advanced periodontitis 38 interproximal intrabony defects were treated by conventional surgery (C; n = 8) or guided tissue regeneration (GTR) using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (G; n = 17) or Polyglactin 910 barriers (V; n = 13). Presurgically (BL), 6 and 12 months postsurgically clinical parameters (GI, PII, PPD, PAL-V) and 36 standardized radiographs were obtained generating 72 pairs (36 BL/6 months; 36 BL/12 months). Using linear measurements on the radiographs and subtraction analysis, bony fill within the defects was assessed. Intrasurgically the extension of the intrabony defects was measured. Statistically significant (p < 0.05) attachment gain was found after 6 (C: 2.4 +/- 1.6 mm; G: 3.2 +/- 1.6 mm; V: 3.4 +/- 1.5 mm) and 12 months in all groups (C: 2.4 +/- 1.7 mm; G: 3.1 +/- 1.7 mm; V: 4.0 +/- 1.7 mm). Thirty-nine of 72 pairs of radiographs were unsuitable for subtraction analysis. Significant (p < 0.05) bony fill was observed at 6 (C: 0.3 +/- 1.0 mm; G: 0.7 +/- 1.2 mm; V: 0.9 +/- 1.2 mm) and 12 months (C: 0.0 +/- 1.1 mm; G: 1.4 +/- 1.5 mm; V: 1.5 +/- 1.7 mm) only after GTR surgery. GTR therapy yielded significantly more bony fill than conventional surgery 12 months postsurgically (p < 0.1). Bony fill (linear measurement) was influenced by age, smoking, baseline bone loss and PAL-V gain (p < 0.0001). Significantly more radiographs taken with potentially unstable support of the filmholder were not suitable for subtraction analysis than those with stable support (p < 0.05). Bony gain (subtraction analysis) was positively modulated by bony fill (linear measurement) and use of biodegradable barriers (p = 0.002). There is a correlation between PAL-V gain and bony fill (linear measurement). Smoking impairs attachment gain and bony fill. Potentially stable support of the filmholder provided radiographs suitable for subtraction analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eickholz et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: