Why the study?
What are the safety margins for neurovascular structures during placement of anterolateral and medial arthroscopic hip portals?
What are the safety margins for neurovascular structures during placement of anterolateral and medial arthroscopic hip portals?
Medial arthroscopic hip portals carry a higher risk of neurovascular injury compared to lateral portals, specifically to the femoral neurovascular bundle and obturator nerve.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Medial hip portals warrant caution near neurovascular structures; hypothesis-generating for safer portal techniques in prospective studies.
To describe the safety areas for placement of 5 anterolateral portals (anterior, anterior lateral, posterior lateral, proximal anterior medial and distal anterior medial portals) and 3 recently described medial portals (anterior medial, posterior medial and distal posterior medial portals) to provide topographical description of the safety of each. A descriptive, observational and crosssectional study in which femoral triangle dissection was performed in 12 hips. 5 lateral portals and the 3 medial portals were placed. Clinically relevant neurovascular structures associated with each portal, were identified measured and documented. The lateral portal with the highest risk of injury to a nearby neurovascular structure was the anterior portal, the most adjacent to the femoral cutaneous nerve, 1.42 cm (0.85) lateral to the portal. In the medial portals, the anterior medial portal has the narrowest margin in relation to the femoral artery, 2.14 cm (0.35) lateral to the portal and medial to the obturator nerve by 0.87 cm (0.62). The lateral portals have a higher safety margin; the portal with the most proximity to a neurovascular structure is the anterior portal, associated laterally with the femoral cutaneous nerve, presenting a higher risk of injury. Medial portals have a higher risk of injuring the femoral neurovascular bundle as well as the obturator nerve.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Méndez-Aguirre et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: