Why the study?
Does routine post-operative intravenous digital subtraction angiography detect clinically unsuspected complications after vascular surgery?
Does routine post-operative intravenous digital subtraction angiography detect clinically unsuspected complications after vascular surgery?
Routine post-operative intravenous digital subtraction angiography detects a significant rate (12.7%) of clinically unsuspected complications after vascular surgery, prompting closer follow-up or re-operation.
May support routine post-op angiography surveillance after vascular surgery; leaves open impact on outcomes.
Intravenous digital subtraction angiography was performed within 20 days of 678 vascular reconstructions as a routine post-operative evaluation. After 339 carotid endarterectomies, 34 patients showed a stenosis of greater than 30% and six occlusions were seen. In 157 patients after aortic aneurysm repair, we found five anastomotic aneurysms and seven stenoses of greater than 30%. After aortic bypass surgery, 77 patients were evaluated and nine stenoses were found; no anastomotic aneurysms were seen. In 105 patients with femoro-distal bypass procedures, occlusion was reported in 11 cases and stenosis in 13 cases. One patient had two anastomotic aneurysms. To summarize, major abnormalities were present in 81 cases (12.7%) and consisted of 59 stenoses of greater than 30%, 17 occlusions and six patients with anastomotic aneurysms. Most of these were unexpected and were reason for more critical follow-up or re-operation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teeuwen et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: