In this study, we demonstrate that a surprisingly small and discontinuous period of estradiol (E2) treatment is sufficient to induce progesterone-facilitated sexual receptivity in the female rat. We used this temporal paradigm to measure associated changes in nuclear E2 and cytosol progestin receptors (CPRs) in the mediobasal hypothalamus-preoptic area (MBHPOA) and pituitary (PIT). The lordosis quotient, lordosis quality, and preceptivity scores of animals which received E2 in Silastic capsules for 24 or 6 continuous h were not significantly different at 24 h. CPRs in the MBH-POA and PIT in animals which received E2 for 24 or 6 continuous h were equivalent at 24 h. Receptivity comparable to 24 or 6 h of continuous E2 treatment was seen in animals which received only two 1-h periods of E2, provided that the second treatment began not fewer than 4 h, or more than 13 h, after the end of the first period (sufficient treatment). If animals received only two 0.5-h periods of E2 treatment during these times, receptivity was not observed (insufficient treatment). Sufficient treatment was associated with a threshold level of CPRs in the MBH-POA (25–35% maximal induction), whereas insufficient treatment was not. Our hour of E2 treatment produced twice the level of nuclear estradiol receptors (NERs) as did 0.5 h of E2 in the MBH-POA and PIT. After capsule removal, NER levels in the MBH-POA and PIT sharply decreased in both the 1 and 0.5 h treatment groups. The time course of decline of NER levels was a first order process, with a alf-life of 3.5 h in the MBH-POA. We conclude that two periods of E2 treatment with a total exposure time of 2 h during 24 h are sufficient to activate the lordosis reflex and elevate CPRs to threshold levels in the hypothalamus. An essentially discontinuous (≤3.6% NER capacity between two peaks) pattern of NER levels in the nuclei of hypothalamic cells is associated with these changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parsons et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: