This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This article outlines the different modalities that have been used for the diagnosis of intraabdominal visceral injury. The methods span decades, and their development was driven by the need to provide an accurate and rapid diagnosis of intraabdominal injury for the patient. Some of these modalities parallel the explosion in technology. Each has been validated and criticized but eventually had developed its own "niche" in the assessment of the injured patient. Finally, they have all withstood the test of time.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rozycki et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: