Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper examines how Ireland’s 2021 wellbeing framework, an ambitious first step in adopting a wellbeing economy approach beyond “fickle” GDP-centric growth can evolve from a descriptive metric to a transformative policy driver by incorporating a systems thinking perspective. Ireland’s wellbeing framework, comprising 11 dimensions and 35 available-data indicators, enters public policy development relatively late after objectives are set, potentially limiting innovation. The framework, as is, is insufficient to generate change without a means of embedding it within the policymaking process more holistically. Thus, this paper recommends the integration of systems thinking to reveal opportunities for wellbeing economics-driven systemic change. This paper proposes an abductive, iterative cycle linking the wellbeing framework to policy: emergent objectives guide data review and systems mapping; evidence refines dynamic indicators; and wellbeing gaps reshape sectoral priorities. The paper concludes by redefining policy and framework development to achieve holistic, upstream progress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rebecca Kerr (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: