This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective: To compare surgical outcomes of C2 dome-like laminectomy with C2 partial laminectomy in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) up to the C2 level and above. Methods: = 16). The cervical curvature (CCI), dura width at C2/3, Japanese orthopedic association (JOA) score, recovery rate (RR), neck disability index (NDI) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were evaluated and compared preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter. Results: The JOA score and NDI significantly improved at the final follow-up in both groups with no significant intergroup differences. There were no significant differences in preoperative dura width at C2/3 and VAS between the two groups. At the final follow-up, dura width at C2/3 in the C2-PL group was significantly larger than the C2-DOM group, while the VAS of C2-DOM group was significantly lower than C2-PL group. The CCI in both groups decreased compared with before surgery, and there was no significant difference in CCI between the two groups. Conclusion: C2-DOM is less demolitive and reduces postoperative neck pain, while C2-PL can achieve more adequate decompression without increasing the risk of postoperative cervical kyphosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miao et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: