presence of 4r tau in AD pathologies may be underestimated when rD4 is used.However, anti-4r (available from Cosmo Bio Co., Ltd.) raised against rD4 peptide with N279D substitution stained both wild-type and deamidated 4r tau, and strongly stained rD3+/rD4-tangles and smearing tau fragments in sarkosyl-insoluble fraction of AD brain [2].It was reported that rD3 stained abundant ghost tangles in entorhinal cortex and tangles in CA1, but failed to stain fine processes of tangles and threads [3], while rD4 failed to detect ghost tangles in entorhinal cortex [3].To understand these findings, we examined the influence of protease on immunoreactivity.paraffin sections of AD brains were treated with 10 μg/mL proteinase K (pro-K) for 30 min after autoclaving (Ac) and formic acid (FA) treatment.rD3 staining was strongly enhanced (Fig. 1a,b).Conversely, rD4 immunoreactivity almost completely disappeared after pro-K treatment (Fig. 1c,d).Not only ghost tangles but also rD3-/rD4+ tangles and their processes became rD3-positive after pro-K treatment (Fig. 1a,b), strongly suggesting that the rD3 epitope was buried in tau filaments of intracellular tangles and threads, and was exposed by pro-K treatment.Contrary to expectation, anti-4r staining was also enhanced by pro-K treatment (Fig. 1e,f).It is possible that the recognition site of anti-4r is distinct from that of rD4 and is exposed by pro-K treatment of sections.Anti-4r antibody may recognize the carboxyl-half of the antigen peptide, while rD4 recognizes the amino-terminal half around N279. pro-K treatment was also effective in immunostaining of free-floating AD sections with a lower concentration.To confirm these findings biochemically, sarkosylinsoluble fractions from two AD brains were treated with trypsin or pro-K, then immunoblotted with rD3, rD4, anti-4r and anti-ps396 (Fig. 1g-j).rD3 strongly stained many bands and smears, as seen with ps396 (Fig. 1g,j),
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasegawa et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: