Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Psychometric evaluation demonstrates structural validity and measurement invariance for the Dutch D70 scale across community and student cohorts, indicating robust assessment of socially aversive...
The Dark Factor of Personality (D) represents a common dispositional core underlying socially and morally aversive traits (Moshagen et al., 2018, 2020). This study provides the first psychometric evaluation of the Dutch 70-item D factor scale (Dutch D70) across two independent samples: an online community sample (n = 978) and a student sample (n = 1,806). Using confirmatory factor analysis, we compared a unidimensional model, a hierarchical second-order model, and a bifactor model. In both samples, the bifactor structure demonstrated the best overall fit. It indicated a dominant general Dark Factor accounting for the vast majority of the common variance with high reliability. The specific residual factors contributed minimal unique variance. Multi-group analyses supported full scalar invariance across self-reported sex, showing that the scale functions equivalently for men and women. Construct and nomological validity were supported through consistent associations of D with lower empathic concern and higher levels of low morality and ethnocentrism. Significant relations between D and self-reported out-group aggression further supported criterion-related validity. Overall, the findings show that the Dutch D70 is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing a strong general Dark Factor, with structural and validity evidence replicated across both community and student samples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buck et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: