Literature review finds a complete lack of mathematical formalism or empirical data in panpsychism discussions, indicating a persistent divide between philosophy and testable science.
FINDING: The search results are philosophical and popular-science discussions of panpsychism, with no new mathematical formalism, equations, or empirical data presented. The only mathematical artifact is an arXiv paper on science education outreach (IPPOG), which is unrelated to consciousness. | MATH: None extracted. No equations, constants, or ratios appear in the titles/abstracts. The sole arXiv reference (2011.14743v1) concerns particle physics outreach, not consciousness. | CONNECTION: None. No geometric ratios (0.382, 0.618, 0.786, 1.618, 2.618), base-60 systems, crystallographic symmetries, root systems, or lattice structures are mentioned or implied. | DEPTH: 1/10 — The findings are qualitative philosophical arguments (Goff, Strawson, Faggin) and rebuttals, lacking any testable mathematical structure. The quantum-information panpsychism claim (Faggin/D'Ariano) hints at a formal basis but no equations are provided in the search results. No advance in mathematical understanding of Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew Stewart Caldin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: