This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This paper assesses different retrieval schemes used for the Chinese Gaofen-3 Synthetic Aperture Radar (GF-3 SAR) co-polarized data. The data consist of 4186 GF-3 data points and collocated wind information from sources including the ASCAT scatterometer, HY2A-SCAT scatterometer, and National Data Buoy Center (NDBC) buoy wind data set. The VV-polarized geophysical model function (GMF) is a CMOD7 model while the HH-polarized GMF is a hybrid of the CMOD7 and PR model. Assessments involve comparisons between SAR-derived and collocated winds in terms of the root-mean-square difference (RMSD) and bias. First, a comparison between the two retrieval schemes for the VV-polarized data clearly shows that the optimal scheme performs better than the classical scheme for wind speed retrieval. Comparisons for HH-polarized data show similar results. These experiments indicate that the wind speed RMSDs for the GF-3 co-polarized data are within 2 m/s when using the optimal scheme. Moreover, the wind direction RMSDs from the two schemes have no significant difference, with values near 20°. Overall, these assessments indicate that the GF-3 co-polarized data are sufficient for operational wind speed retrieval using the optimal scheme. However, wind direction retrieval requires further improvement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: