Key result
A modified sizing technique for the David procedure resulted in no or trace intraoperative aortic regurgitation in 95.2% of patients, with a 1.6% rate of 30-day mortality, stroke, or MI.
Why the study?
Valve-sparing root replacement varies in specific points while aiming for optimal intraoperative results and long-term stability, prompting evaluation of a modified sizing technique for the David procedure.
Observational (n=63)
No
A modified sizing technique for the valve-sparing David procedure demonstrated good intraoperative valve competence and acceptable mid-term outcomes.
Acceptable early results with modified David sizing; leaves open durability versus standard techniques.
BACKGROUND: Valve sparing root replacement differs in specific points. The main target remains to achieve a perfect intraoperative result and long-term stability. We aimed in this study to present our modified sizing technique for valve-sparing "David" procedure and its mid-term results. METHODS: We present a retrospective single-center study. A newly designed sizing ring in addition to triple-armed forceps (Trifeet®) was used to measure the proper size of the Valsalva® prosthesis for patients undergoing David-procedure. Primary endpoints are intraoperative aortic regurgitation (AR) and early postoperative outcomes. Secondary endpoints included freedom from aortic regurgitation or reoperation and overall mortality. RESULTS: A total of 63 consecutive patients who underwent David procedure between 09/2012 and 12/2016 were evaluated. Mean age was 52±15 years and 76.2% were male. Moderate to severe aortic regurgitation was reported in 60 (95.2%) patients. Four (6.3%) patients presented with type-A aortic dissection, 20 (31.7%) patients had bicuspid and 3 (4.8%) had a unicuspid aortic valve, 2 (3.2%) patients had a prior aortic valve repair. Intraoperative echocardiography revealed no 34 (54%), trace 26 (41.2%) or moderate 3 (4.8%) AR. Stroke, myocardial infarction, and 30-day mortality occurred in 1 patient (1.6%). During follow-up 5 (7.9%) patients needed reoperation due to recurrent AR within a mean of 35±18 months. One could be re-repaired, and the other four underwent aortic valve replacement. A second patient died in the late follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our modified sizing technique simplifies the "David-procedure" and allows to achieve a good intraoperative and mid-term results. However, these results have to be confirmed in a larger cohort with a long-term follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shehada et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Aortic root replacement (David procedure) (n=63). Modified sizing technique (sizing ring and Trifeet forceps) was evaluated on Intraoperative aortic regurgitation (AR) and early postoperative outcomes. A modified sizing technique for the David procedure resulted in no or trace intraoperative aortic regurgitation in 95.2% of patients, with a 1.6% rate of 30-day mortality, stroke, or MI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: