Key result
Surgical repair of complex aortic valve endocarditis complicated by paravalvular abscess formation using stentless bioprostheses was feasible, yielding in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates of 18.8% and 12.5%, respectively.
Why the study?
Does a standardized surgical approach using stentless bioprostheses improve survival in patients with complex aortic valve endocarditis and paravalvular abscess?
Observational (n=16)
No
Does a standardized surgical approach using stentless bioprostheses improve survival in patients with complex aortic valve endocarditis and paravalvular abscess?
A standardized surgical approach using stentless bioprostheses for complex aortic valve endocarditis with paravalvular abscess is feasible and yields favorable early mortality rates compared to predicted risk.
Observed mortality below prediction supports feasibility in high-risk endocarditis; leaves open need for comparative trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of complicated aortic valve endocarditis often is challenging, even for experienced surgeons. We aim at demonstrating a standardized surgical approach by stentless bioprostheses for the treatment of aortic valve endocarditis complicated by paravalvular abscess formation. METHODS: Sixteen patients presenting with aortic valve endocarditis (4 native and 12 prosthetic valves) and paravalvular abscess formation at various localizations and to different extents were treated by a standardized approach using stentless bioprostheses. The procedure consisted of thorough debridement, root replacement with reimplantation of the coronary arteries and correction of accompanying pathologies (aortoventricular and aortomitral dehiscence, septum derangements, Gerbode defect, total atrioventricular conduction block, mitral and tricuspid valve involvement). RESULTS: All highly complex patients included (14 males and 2 females; median age 63 years [range 31-77]) could be successfully treated with stentless bioprostheses as aortic root replacement. Radical surgical debridement of infected tissue with anatomical recontruction was feasible. Although predicted operative mortality was high (median logarithmic EuroSCORE I of 40.7 [range 12.8-68.3]), in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were favorable (18.8 and 12.5% respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Repair of active aortic valve endocarditis complicated by paravalvular abscess formation and destruction of the left ventricular outflow tract with stentless bioprosthesis is a valuable option for both native and prosthetic valves. It presents a standardized approach with a high success rate for complete debridement, is readily available, and yields comparable clinical outcomes to the historical gold standard, repair by homografts. Additionally, use of one type of prosthesis reduces logistical issues and purchasing costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gomes et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Aortic valve endocarditis complicated by paravalvular abscess formation (n=16). Stentless bioprostheses (Freestyle) was evaluated on In-hospital mortality. Surgical repair of complex aortic valve endocarditis complicated by paravalvular abscess formation using stentless bioprostheses was feasible, yielding in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates of 18.8% and 12.5%, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: