To unravel the effects of the volume-excluding central core and the mesogenic pendant group on both the glass-forming ability and morphological stability of the thermally quenched glass, nine model compounds were synthesized that contain various nematogenic and cholesteryl pendant groups. The glass-forming ability of the melt and morphological stability of the thermally quenched glass were assessed using the DSC, XRD, and hot-stage POM techniques. With cyanobiphenyl as the pendant group, the following descending order in morphological stability against thermally activated recrystallization was established: trans-cyclohexane < all-exo-bicyclo [2.2.2] oct-7-ene < cubane < cis-cyclohexane < benzene. While the cyclohexane compound containing three cyanoterphenyl groups showed a strong tendency to crystallize upon quenching, the chiral nematic system in which one of the cyanoterphenyl groups is substituted by a cholesteryl group showed superior glass-forming ability and morphological stability. Additionally, with cis-cyclohexane as the central core the angular 6-(4-cyanophenyl)-naphthyl group, a stronger nematogen, showed a comparable glass-forming ability but a superior morphological ability in comparison to the cyanobiphenyl group. However, with all-exo-bicyclo[2.2.2]oct-7-ene as the central core, the angular 1-phenyl-2-(6-cyanonaphth-2-yl)ethyne, also a stronger nematogen, turned out to be inferior to the cyanobiphenyl group with respect to morphological stability. It appears that the glass-forming ability and morphological stability of the hybrid system are determined by the characters of both the volume-excluding core and the pendant group, a delicate structural balance between the two constituents, and the stereochemistry of the hybrid system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: