Key result
Microhematuria was present in 61% of confirmed infective endocarditis episodes versus 56% of non-confirmed episodes (p=0.223), and its addition did not enhance the 2023 ISCVID-Duke criteria.
Why the study?
Microhematuria is common in infective endocarditis, but whether adding it to the 2023 Duke-ISCVID minor immunological criteria improves diagnostic performance was unknown.
Does the addition of microhematuria to the 2023 ISCVID-Duke minor immunological criteria improve diagnostic performance in patients with suspected infective endocarditis?
Observational (n=801)
No
Does the addition of microhematuria to the 2023 ISCVID-Duke minor immunological criteria improve diagnostic performance in patients with suspected infective endocarditis?
Absolute Event Rate: 61% vs 56%
p-value: p=0.223
The addition of microhematuria to the 2023 ISCVID-Duke minor immunological criteria does not improve the overall diagnostic performance for infective endocarditis.
Microhematuria does not aid infective endocarditis diagnosis; retrospective data leave open its addition to the 2023 ISCVID-Duke criteria.
Background/Objectives: Microhematuria is common in patients with infective endocarditis (IE). The present study aims to assess whether the addition of microhematuria in the 2023 Duke-International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) minor immunological criteria could enhance its diagnostic performance. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland (2014–2024). All patients with suspected IE and urinalysis within 24 h from presentation were included. The Endocarditis Team classified episodes as IE or non-IE. Microhematuria was defined as >5 red blood cells per high power field (HPF). Results: Among 801 episodes with suspected IE, 263 (33%) were diagnosed with IE. Microhematuria (>5/HPF) was present in 462 (58%) episodes, with no difference between episodes with and without confirmed IE (61% versus 56%; p = 0.223). Based on the 2023 ISCVID-Duke, minor immunological criteria were present in 42 episodes (5%). By adding microhematuria, 473 (59%) episodes met the minor immunological criteria. Sensitivity of the clinical criteria of the 2023 ISCVID-Duke version without and with hematuria was calculated at 75% (69–80%) and 86% (81–90%), respectively. Specificity was at 52% (48–57%) and 40% (36–45%), respectively. Among episodes with suspected IE, microhematuria was associated with female sex, enterococcal bacteremia, sepsis or septic shock, acute kidney injury, non-cerebral embolic events, and bone and joint infection. Conclusions: Microhematuria was frequent among patients with suspected IE, but it was not associated with the diagnosis of IE. The addition of microhematuria in the 2023 ISCVID-Duke minor immunological criteria did not enhance the overall performance of the criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Regina et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Suspected infective endocarditis (n=801). Confirmed infective endocarditis vs. Without confirmed infective endocarditis was evaluated on Presence of microhematuria (>5 red blood cells per high power field) (p=0.223). Microhematuria was present in 61% of confirmed infective endocarditis episodes versus 56% of non-confirmed episodes (p=0.223), and its addition did not enhance the 2023 ISCVID-Duke criteria.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: