Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 1, 2000Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume

The skeletal response to matt and polished cemented femoral stems

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

DBD.S. BarkerRoyal Adelaide HospitalAWA. W. WangQueen Elizabeth II Medical CentreMYMichael F. YeoRoyal Adelaide Hospital

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Barker et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9549d16f34f99aa233147ahttps://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.82b8.0821182
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effects of cement creep on stem subsidence and stresses in the cement mantle of a total hip replacement1997 · 40 citations
  2. 2Bone remodelling in the proximal femur after Charnley total hip arthroplasty1995 · 68 citations
  3. 3The Use of a Collar and Precoating on Cemented Femoral Stems Is Unnecessary and Detrimental1992 · 95 citations
  4. 4Is It Advantageous to Strengthen the Cement-Metal Interface and Use a Collar for Cemented Femoral Components of Total Hip Replacements?1992 · 121 citations
  5. 5Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems1998 · 76 citations