Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To study the effect of drainage intensity on GHG emissions and N drainage losses in cool-humid Norway, we established drainage systems with 6 and 12 m drain spacing in a previously undrained sandy loam (Mollic gleysol) collecting data in the years 2014–2016. After sowing a mixed grass ley, subsurface drainage was larger (1271 versus 699 mm) and mean ground water table (GWT) lower (102 versus 79 cm) with 6 than with 12 m drain spacing. Water filled pore space (WFPS) remained high throughout most of the year (> 80 %). It was highest in 12 m drain spacing, but shortly after fertilizations no differences between the two drainage systems were found. N 2 O emissions after fertilization were larger in the 12 m system than in the 6 m system. Cumulative N 2 O emissions in the 6 and 12 m system were 4.0 versus 2.5 kg N ha −2 yr −1 . N leaching for the entire observation period (29 months) was larger in the 6 m (42 kg ha −1 ) than the 12 m (19 kg ha −1 ) system . Grass yields, plant N-recovery and fertilizer N use efficiency was larger with 6 than 12 m. The mean N 2 O emission factor was significantly higher with 6 than with 12 m drain spacing (1.4 versus 0.8 % N 2 O-N of N applied). The 6 m system acted as a net sink for CH 4 , whereas the 12 m system was a net CH 4 source and had a higher climate forcing than the 12 m system (1390 versus 1110 g CO 2 eq. m −2 yr −1 ), but scaled for grass dry matter yield the climate forcing was similar. We conclude that larger N 2 O emissions with 6 m drain spacing were likely due to a combination of less complete denitrification and a naturally higher SOM content at this site, releasing extra mineral N. Our study can therefore not confirm that increased drainage intensity intrinsically reduces N 2 O emissions from crop production in cool-humid climates. • Reducing drain spacing from 12 to 6 m did not reduce N 2 O emissions. • Soil variation has a large effect on the impact of drain spacing on N 2 O emission. • Reduced drain spacing increased subsurface drainage and N-leaching. • Soil conditions were more reductive with 12 than 6 m drain spacing. • Reduced drain spacing changed CH 4 fluxes from net emission to net uptake.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hansen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: