Key result
The Monash Health rapid rule-out criteria for myocardial infarction demonstrated 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 96.5-100.0) and 100% negative predictive value (95% CI: 98.9-100.0).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to externally validate the Monash Health rapid rule-out criteria for myocardial infarction, derived in a general ED, in a tertiary cardiac emergency population.
Do the Monash Health rapid rule-out criteria using the Beckman Access hsTnI assay accurately rule out myocardial infarction in patients presenting to a tertiary cardiac emergency department?
Observational (n=1,253)
No
Do the Monash Health rapid rule-out criteria using the Beckman Access hsTnI assay accurately rule out myocardial infarction in patients presenting to a tertiary cardiac emergency department?
The Monash Health rapid rule-out criteria using the Beckman Access hsTnI assay demonstrated 100% sensitivity and NPV for ruling out myocardial infarction in a tertiary cardiac emergency department, supporting its external validity.
Supports RRO criteria for MI rule-out in this cohort; leaves open need for prospective validation before wider use.
OBJECTIVE: To externally validate the current Monash Health criteria for rapid rule-out (RRO) of myocardial infarction (MI) at a tertiary cardiac emergency (CE). METHODS: All patients with suspected MI at the Victorian Heart Hospital (VHH) CE from April to June 2023 were eligible. Those with ST-elevation MI diagnosis from the initial ECG were excluded. The Monash Health RRO thresholds for the Access hsTnI laboratory high-sensitivity cardiac-troponin-I (hs-cTnI) assay are < 6 ng/L (females) or < 11 ng/L (males). The RRO criteria, derived at a general emergency department (ED) also require symptom onset > 2-h pre-hs-cTnI test and an ECG with no new ischaemic changes. MI diagnosis was determined by cardiologist-emergency physician consensus. The primary objective was the demonstration of RRO criteria performance in the VHH CE population, with sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for index MI > 99%. Patient characteristics were also compared for those meeting RRO criteria or not. RESULTS: For the 1253 eligible patients, median age was 66 years [IQR: 53, 78] and 686 (54.7%) were male. Of the total, 334 (26.7%) met RRO criteria. The NPV for MI was 100% (95% CI: 98.9, 100.0), with sensitivity 100% (95% CI: 96.5, 100.0). Those meeting RRO criteria were younger (60 [IQR: 49, 72] vs. 68 [IQR: 56, 80] years) and less likely to be admitted (21.9% [95% CI: 17.5, 26.7] vs 49.6% [95% CI: 46.3, 52.9]). CONCLUSIONS: RRO criteria derived in a general ED population had a similarly high sensitivity and NPV for MI at a tertiary CE department. This supports external validity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meek et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Suspected Myocardial Infarction (n=1,253). Monash Health rapid rule-out (RRO) criteria vs. Patients not meeting RRO criteria was evaluated on Sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for index MI (95% CI 98.9-100.0). The Monash Health rapid rule-out criteria for myocardial infarction demonstrated 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 96.5-100.0) and 100% negative predictive value (95% CI: 98.9-100.0).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: