Key result
A multifactorial injury prevention intervention showed a trend toward a lower injury incidence rate compared with control (2.18 vs. 2.73; p=0.061) in Physical Education Teacher Education students.
Why the study?
Does a multifactorial injury prevention intervention reduce injury incidence in Physical Education Teacher Education students?
Does a multifactorial injury prevention intervention reduce injury incidence in Physical Education Teacher Education students?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.18% vs 2.73%
p-value: p=0.061
A multifactorial injury prevention intervention embedded into a regular PETE programme may reduce injury incidence, particularly acute and extracurricular injuries.
May not yet alter PETE injury prevention practice; leaves open efficacy pending randomized confirmation.
Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE) students are at considerable risk for non-contact sports injuries of the lower extremities. Multifactorial injury prevention interventions including exercises have been successful in sports populations, but no such study has ever been performed in PETE students. This study investigated the efficacy of a multifactorial injury prevention intervention on injury incidence reduction in PETE students. PETE students in the intervention group (n = 154) and in the control group (n = 189) registered sports injuries prospectively. The intervention lasted one academic year and consisted of an injury awareness programme and preventive strategies, implemented by the PETE sports lecturers. Differences in injury incidence between the intervention and control group were tested by Poisson regression Wald tests. There was a trend towards significantly lower incidence rate (2.18 vs. 2.73; p = 0.061) in the intervention group compared with the control group. Students in the intervention group had significantly less acute, first-time and extracurricular injuries. The largest reduction was observed for injuries during unsupervised practice sessions. A multifactorial injury prevention intervention embedded into a regular PETE programme is a promising and feasible strategy to prevent injuries in PETE students. Further research is needed to investigate whether the results may be generalised to other PETE programmes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goossens et al. (2015) studied Sports injuries (n=343). Multifactorial injury prevention intervention vs. Control group was evaluated on Injury incidence rate (p=0.061). A multifactorial injury prevention intervention showed a trend toward a lower injury incidence rate compared with control (2.18 vs. 2.73; p=0.061) in Physical Education Teacher Education students.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: