Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Spider venom is a complex mixture of bioactive peptides to subdue their prey. Early estimates suggested that over 400 venom peptides are produced per species. In order to investigate the mechanisms responsible for this impressive diversity, transcriptomics based on second generation high throughput sequencing was combined with peptidomic assays to characterize the venom of the tarantula Haplopelma hainanum . The genes expressed in the venom glands were identified, and the bioactivity of their protein products was analyzed using the patch clamp technique. A total of 1,136 potential toxin precursors were identified that clustered into 90 toxin groups, of which 72 were novel. The toxin peptides clustered into 20 cysteine scaffolds that included between 4 and 12 cysteines, and 14 of these groups were newly identified in this spider. Highly abundant toxin peptide transcripts were present and resulted from hypermutation and/or fragment insertion/deletion. In combination with variable post-translational modifications, this genetic variability explained how a limited set of genes can generate hundreds of toxin peptides in venom glands. Furthermore, the intraspecies venom variability illustrated the dynamic nature of spider venom and revealed how complex components work together to generate diverse bioactivities that facilitate adaptation to changing environments, types of prey, and milking regimes in captivity. Background: Spider venom is a complex mixture and contains over 400 venom peptides/species. Results: Highly abundant hypermutation, fragment insertion/deletion, and variable post-translational modifications were observed in venom gland, and the highly diverse toxins exhibit diverse functions. Conclusion: Spider toxins are abundant and variable, factors that work together to generate diverse bioactivities. Significance: Our study reveals the mechanism of structural and functional diversity of peptide toxins from Ornithoctonus hainana.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: