Key result
Shorter intervals from myocardial infarction to CABG were associated with higher hospital mortality (3.5% at 0-30 days vs 1.1% for no MI, P<0.0001) and lower 10-year survival.
Why the study?
Does the timing of CABG after myocardial infarction affect early and late mortality?
Cohort (n=8,320)
Does the timing of CABG after myocardial infarction affect early and late mortality?
While early and late mortality after CABG are higher when performed closer to a myocardial infarction, this is driven by comorbidities, lack of LIMA use, and non-elective status rather than the timing itself.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Higher mortality with early post-MI CABG reflects comorbidities and urgency rather than timing; leaves independent effect and practice change open.
OBJECTIVES: The optimal timing of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after myocardial infarction (MI) is still controversial. With advances in perioperative care and myocardial protection, CABG is not infrequently undertaken sooner. Although CABG soon after MI is associated with high morbidity and mortality, the impact of CABG timing on late survival is not clear. METHODS: We analysed prospectively collected data for 8320 patients who underwent primary CABG from 1996 through 2010. Operative outcomes and late survival were compared between patient categories based on MI-to-CABG days: groups A (0-30, n = 658), B (31-60, n = 734), C (>90, n = 2698) and D (no MI, n = 4230). The effect of the timing of surgery on survival was determined using multivariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: As the MI-to-CABG interval increased, the frequency of urgent/emergency operations decreased and hospital mortality (A, 3.5% vs B, 2.6% vs C, 1.2%, vs D, 1.1%, P < 0.0001) steadily declined. In general, patients who had CABG within 90 days of MI had more cardiac morbidity and co-morbidities. Expectedly, therefore, postoperative organ system dysfunction (cardiac, renal, respiratory and neurological) was more frequent in these groups. Reoperation for bleeding was similar for all groups, but blood product transfusion decreased as the MI-to-CABG days increased. The 10-year survival improved with the MI-to-CABG interval (A, 72.2% vs B, 73.4% vs C, 75.8% vs D, 81.4%, P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, the MI-to-CABG interval was not a risk factor for operative or late mortality. However, less frequent were left internal mammary artery use, non-elective surgery and high blood transfusion rates; all more often associated with shorter MI-to-CABG intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Early and late mortality risk for CABG declines with increasing interval from MI for reasons indirectly linked to the timing of surgery. Our findings emphasize the importance of preoperative organ system optimization and consistent left internal mammary artery use, regardless of the proximity of surgery to MI or the exigency of surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ngaage et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Myocardial infarction (n=8,320). Early CABG after myocardial infarction (0-30 days) vs. Delayed CABG (>90 days) or no myocardial infarction was evaluated on Hospital mortality (p=<0.0001). Shorter intervals from myocardial infarction to CABG were associated with higher hospital mortality (3.5% at 0-30 days vs 1.1% for no MI, P<0.0001) and lower 10-year survival.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: