This paper traces the evolution of the course evaluation process in Drexel University's College of Engineering (USA), as they adapt to the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology 2000 accreditation requirements. The authors discuss the goals of the change, the development of the format used, the evaluation procedures, and the successes and problems encountered. This process has also been supported by the Gateway Engineering Education Coalition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scoles et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: