The capacitive resistivity (CR) method is a time‐ and labor‐saving alternative to traditional direct current (DC) resistivity methods. The line electrode variant of CR suffers from the absence of data inversion programs as available for the DC resistivity method. Direct current inversion programs were applied to determine the resistivity distribution from CR measurements using an approximately equivalent four‐point dipole–dipole configuration. We optimized configurations to minimize the systematic error applying DC inversion programs to CR, using data based on the comparison of the two‐dimensional sensitivities of the proposed DC approximations. The optimal four‐point dipole–dipole geometry has a dipole length of 80%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neukirch et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: