Key result
Model-based clustering identified six distinct latent clusters of individuals with moderate to severe depression that exhibited significant differences in socioeconomic factors, somatic diseases, and medication use.
Why the study?
Depression is heterogeneous, and identifying latent subgroups along with their differential sociodemographic and health-related factors may facilitate targeted treatment.
Cross-Sectional (n=2,900)
Socioeconomic factors, somatic diseases, and prescription medication use are differentially associated with distinct and clinically relevant clusters of individuals with moderate to severe depression.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Depression subgroup clustering may inform targeted approaches; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Depression is a heterogeneous disease. Identification of latent depression subgroups and differential associations across these putative groups and sociodemographic and health-related factors might pave the way toward targeted treatment of individuals. METHODS: We used model-based clustering to identify relevant subgroups of 2900 individuals with moderate to severe depression (defined as scores ≥10 on the PHQ-9 instrument) from the NHANES cross-sectional survey. We used ANOVA and chi-squared tests to assess associations between cluster membership and sociodemographics, health-related variables, and prescription medication use. RESULTS: We identified six latent clusters of individuals, three based on depression severity and three differentially loaded by somatic and mental components of the PHQ-9. The Severe mental depression cluster had the most individuals with low education and income (P < 0.05). We observed differences in the prevalence of numerous health conditions, with the Severe mental depression cluster showing the worst overall physical health. We observed marked differences between the clusters regarding prescription medication use: the Severe mental depression cluster had the highest use of cardiovascular and metabolic agents, while the Uniform severe depression cluster showed the highest use of central nervous system and psychotherapeutic agents. LIMITATIONS: Due to the cross-sectional design we cannot make conclusions about causal relationships. We used self-reported data. We did not have access to a replication cohort. CONCLUSIONS: We show that socioeconomic factors, somatic diseases, and prescription medication use are differentially associated with distinct and clinically relevant clusters of individuals with moderate to severe depression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gabarrell‐Pascuet et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Moderate to severe depression (n=2,900). Latent depression clusters vs. Between-cluster comparisons was evaluated on Cluster membership associations with sociodemographics, health-related variables, and prescription medication use. Model-based clustering identified six distinct latent clusters of individuals with moderate to severe depression that exhibited significant differences in socioeconomic factors, somatic diseases, and medication use.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: