Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Treatment of Ni(COD)2 with Me2C(CH2NCHpy)2 (dmp(PI)2) afforded pseudo-square planar, diamagnetic {dmp(PI)22−}NiII (Ni[0]), which contains radical anion pyridine-imine (PI) units bound to Ni(II). Ag+ oxidation of Ni[0] provided [{dmp(PI)2}Ni]+ (Ni[+]) whose assignment as Ni(I) or Ni(II) was made on the basis of ab initio calculations, and EPR spectroscopy. Upon crystallization, Ni[+] formed an asymmetric dimer, [{dmp(PI)2}2NiIINi0]2+ (Ni[2+]Ni[0]), consisting of pseudo-octahedral Ni(II) and pseudo-tetrahedral Ni(0). Ferrocenium oxidation (2 equiv.) of Ni[0] provided [{dmp(PI)2}(MeCN)2NiII]2+ (Ni[2+]), while KC8 reduction provided [{dmp(PI)23−}NiII]−(K(THF)2)+ (Ni[−]) in polymeric form (K+ counterion) or as ion-pairs (with K+(crypt-2.2.2)). Excess K0 or 2 equiv. Cs0 and Ni[0] provided highly sensitive [{dmp(PI)24−}NiII]2− (Ni[2−]), which disproportionates with CC bond formation and dehydrogenation to afford [{2-py,3-PI,4-Me2-azacyclopent-2-ene2−}2Ni]2− [K+(crypt-2.2.2)]2 (Ni[AcPP]) upon addition of crypt-2.2.2. All redox events may be construed as shuttling electrons in and out of the ligand scaffold. While radical character is implicated in the calculations of Ni[+], Ni[0], and Ni[−], the pseudo-square planar species are remarkably resilient to further reactivity, thereby highlighting the stability provided by this geometry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: